bmj.com Rapid Responses for Fassin and Schneider, 326 (7387) 495-497

Rapid Responses to:

EDUCATION AND DEBATE:
Didier Fassin and Helen Schneider
The politics of AIDS in South Africa: beyond the controversies
BMJ 2003; 326: 495-497 [Full text]

Rapid Responses: Submit a response to this article

Browse responses sorted by:

Rapid Responses published:

	Adepegba, Nojeem Adeleye [1 response]
	Alfonso, Helman [150 responses]
	Allen, Anita L [5 responses]
	Atkinson, Pennee [5 responses]
	Balint, Gabor A. [1 response]
	Bartlett, Mark [21 responses]
	Bennett, Nicholas [125 responses]
	Benvenuti, Gregory P [4 responses]
	Bogaert, Louis-Jacques van [1 response]
	Bond, Jim [1 response]
	Brink, Anthony [2 responses]
	Causer, David [151 responses]
	Chakkilala, Murali Mohan [3 responses]
	Cooper, Ed [3 responses]
	Cox, Caroline [1 response]
	D'Sa, Alistair [2 responses]
	David [2 responses]
	Davies, Clive [1 response]
	Engelbrecht, Torsten [4 responses]
	Evans, Jeffrey [2 responses]
	Evans, Jeffrey L [4 responses]
	Fassin, Didier [1 response]
	Feinberg, Louis [16 responses]
	Feliciello, MC [1 response]
	Fenton, Theo HM [2 responses]
	Fiala, Christian [110 responses]
	Fiddian-Green, Richard G [2 responses]
	Flegg, Peter J [57 responses]
	Floyd, Tony [57 responses]
	Floyd, Tony G [1 response]
	Foley, Brian [1 response]
	Foley, Brian T [61 responses]
	Foley, Brian T. [1 response]
	Foster, Harold D. [1 response]
	Gettins, T C [1 response]
	Girodian, Marcel [2 responses]
	Green, Stephen T. [1 response]
	Gregg, Aiden P. [1 response]
	Grove, Matthew L [3 responses]
	Hahn, Sang G. [1 response]
	Hawkins, Jennifer [12 responses]
	Helman [1 response]
	Herbert, Kate A [1 response]
	Horwitz, Moses [16 responses]
	Kamdar, Nassim C [1 response]
	Kirkham, John [2 responses]
	Konotey-Ahulu, Felix ID [1 response]
	Köhnlein, Claus [1 response]
	Lewis, Jack P [1 response]
	Madigan, James I [4 responses]
	Maguire, Stuart A [1 response]
	Maniotis, Andrew [3 responses]
	Marshall, Trevor G [5 responses]
	Mcgregor, Rod [1 response]
	Mhlongo, Sam [112 responses]
	Miceli, Alan F [1 response]
	Miller, Todd [109 responses]
	Mills, Jamie [1 response]
	Mohan, Murali [8 responses]
	Morrell, Peter [7 responses]
	NONE [1 response]
	Newell, Richard L. [1 response]
	Noble, Chris [1 response]
	Noble, Christopher J [86 responses]
	Ortleb, Charles [3 responses]
	Page, Barry [147 responses]
	Page, Barry A. P. [6 responses]
	Pandraud, Guillaume [1 response]
	Papadimitriou, John [153 responses]
	Papadopulos-Eleopulos, Eleni [153 responses]
	Parker, James E [3 responses]
	Powlson, Mark [2 responses]
	Prato, Robert A. Da [3 responses]
	Rasnick, David [12 responses]
	Rumbold, Dr John [3 responses]
	Russell, Alexander H [71 responses]
	Savage, Anne [1 response]
	Scheff, Liam [1 response]
	Schneider, Helen [1 response]
	Smith, John Q [1 response]
	Spagnoli, Bruno [3 responses]
	Ssali, Dr. Charles [1 response]
	Stewart, Gordon [1 response]
	Stone, John [1 response]
	Struthers, Mark [1 response]
	Tahi, Djamel [1 response]
	Turner, Valendar F [152 responses]
	Turningheart, Julian [8 responses]
	Tyler, Christopher S [35 responses]
	Umber, Jean [4 responses]
	Wardell, Joseph [16 responses]
	Whitehead, James J [35 responses]
	Whiting, Paul [1 response]
	Williams, Carl [4 responses]

Adepegba, Nojeem Adeleye
		The ever-changing rules of the game don't apply to Africa (21 July 2003)

Alfonso, Helman
		HIV in South Africa (13 March 2003)
		Low rates of heterosexual transmission and the HIV theory of AIDS (24 March 2003)
		Is There Proof for Heterosexual Transmission of HIV? (27 March 2003)
		Clarification of the basic issues in relation to the HIV theory of AIDS (1 April 2003)
		Assumptions and opinions do not prove heterosexual transmission of HIV (15 April 2003)
		A critical examination of the evidence for the existence of HIV (25 April 2003)
		Let?s critically analyse data instead of merely reading and quoting abstracts (1 May 2003)
		Yes. It is about time to move on. (5 May 2003)
		Where are the experiments which prove HIV isolation, sexual transmission and antibody specificity? (22 May 2003)
		Unravelling the truth (27 May 2003)
		A simple request from the Perth Group (5 June 2003)
		The request remains the same and is still pure and simple (12 June 2003)
		Where is the proof for HIV purification by any method? (19 June 2003)
		Distinguishing between true and "official" HIV infection (20 June 2003)
		We repeat: ?Where is the proof for HIV purification by any method?" (26 June 2003)
		A plea for the references on HIV purification (3 July 2003)
		A further plea for references on HIV purification (9 July 2003)
		Distinguishing between true and "official" HIV infection (12 July 2003)
		?HIV? genome, clones and sequences (18 July 2003)
		The "HIV" and influenza A virus genomes (26 July 2003)
		"HIV" genomic variations (31 July 2003)
		Politics vs. science. (5 August 2003)
		A plea to Christopher Noble (8 August 2003)
		The Perth Group answer to Christopher Noble (21 August 2003)
		Finding wood among the trees (22 September 2003)
		Questions and Answers (13 October 2003)
		Genomic Variability (14 October 2003)
		Divergent HIV strains and antibody tests (16 October 2003)
		gp41 (20 October 2003)
		More On Genomic Variability (23 October 2003)
		Did Montagnier prove the existence of HIV? (4 November 2003)
		More on "HIV" gp41 (25 November 2003)
		Perth Group responses to Brian Foley (25 November 2003)
		Perth Group Responses to Christopher Noble (25 November 2003)
		Has Montagnier discovered the Human Immunodeficiency Virus? (25 November 2003)
		Is there proof of a correlation between the "HIV" antibody and PCR tests and what may underlie such a correlation? (11 December 2003)
		Will Christopher Noble please post his analysis of the 1983 Montagnier Science paper (19 December 2003)
		More on the specificity of PCR and its correlation with the antibody test (19 December 2003)
		Basic requests which remain unanswered by Brian Foley and Christopher Noble (24 December 2003)
		Perth Group response to Murali Mohan Chakkilala (16 January 2004)
		Still no proof for a correlation between the HIV PCR and antibody tests (6 February 2004)
		More responses to Christopher Noble (24 February 2004)
		Perth Group response to Peter Flegg (26 February 2004)
		Perth Group response to Christopher Noble (26 February 2004)
		What is the Perth group's stand? (4 March 2004)
		More responses to Christopher Noble (9 March 2004)
		Basic requests which remain unanswered by Brian Foley and Christopher Noble (23 March 2004)
		Horizontal Transmission ? (23 March 2004)
		Perth Group reasoning (26 March 2004)
		Further response to James Parker (1 April 2004)
		What part of "infectious molecular clone" do you fail to understand? (4 April 2004)
		A second response to Christopher Noble's "What part of "infectious molecular clone" do you fail to understand?" (8 April 2004)
		A reasonable request to the ?HIV?/AIDS experts (20 April 2004)
		The reasonable request to the ?HIV?/AIDS experts still remains (23 April 2004)
		What ?infectious molecular clone of HIV? means? (28 April 2004)
		Two questions to Brian Foley (28 April 2004)
		Questions to Peter Flegg which remain still unanswered (30 April 2004)
		Two questions to Brian Foley (4 May 2004)
		Further response to James Parker FeLV Horizontal Transmission (6 May 2004)
		Two questions to Brian Foley (6 May 2004)
		Re-phrasing our two questions to Brian Foley (11 May 2004)
		A QUESTION AND A REQUEST TO BRIAN FOLEY (12 May 2004)
		A paraphrased request and a question to Brian Foley (14 May 2004)
		Eight simple questions and a repeated request to Brian Foley (24 May 2004)
		Twelve simple questions to Brian Foley (31 May 2004)
		One simple question for the Perth Group. (4 June 2004)
		New and repeated questions and requests to Brian Foley (8 June 2004)
		Did Montagnier discover HIV in 1983? (24 June 2004)
		More on the photo (25 June 2004)
		An oft repeated question to Brian Foley and Christopher Noble (28 June 2004)
		Retrovirologists, retroviruses and purification (1 July 2004)
		Without the ?HIV? genome (poly (A)-RNA banding at 1.16 g/ml) there can be no probes or molecular clones (1 July 2004)
		What is Christopher Noble?s method for proving the existence of a new retrovirus? (6 July 2004)
		One AIDS patient will suffice (6 July 2004)
		We repeat our request: What is Christopher Noble?s method of proving the existence of a new retrovirus? (9 July 2004)
		Where is the virus? (9 July 2004)
		Where is the virus? (14 July 2004)
		Again we ask Christopher Noble to tell us his method of proving the existence of a new retrovirus (14 July 2004)
		The HUT 78 cell line (15 July 2004)
		Where are the proper controls in "HIV" research? (19 July 2004)
		The non-existent knobs on "HIV" particles (19 July 2004)
		MONTAGNIER'S REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE ACTIVITY (23 July 2004)
		WE REPEAT, WHERE IS THE VIRUS? (23 July 2004)
		NICHOLAS BENNETT'S INTERPRETATION OF RICHIERI ET AL (23 July 2004)
		THE CELL LINES HUT102 AND HUT78 (5 August 2004)
		Is oxidation necessary for activation? (17 August 2004)
		Still no proper controls in HIV research (17 August 2004)
		Is oxidation of "HIV" the critical factor? (17 August 2004)
		Is "HIV" sufficient or necessary for T4 cell decrease (AID)? (17 August 2004)
		"HIV" and KS (17 August 2004)
		"HIV", HHV-8 AND KS (20 August 2004)
		Where is the evidence for the existence of the "HIV" genome (20 August 2004)
		Where is the evidence that "HIV" is causally related to KS? (20 August 2004)
		HUT-78 AND HTLV (31 August 2004)
		CELL DEATH AND OXIDATION (31 August 2004)
		A REQUEST TO NICHOLAS BENNETT, CHRISTOPHER NOBLE (31 August 2004)
		THREE REQUESTS TO PETER FLEGG (31 August 2004)
		IS OUR ANALYSIS OF THE ZAGURY PAPER (31 August 2004)
		WATER AND SEMEN: THE SAME CARCINOGENIC PROPERTIES? (2 September 2004)
		"OKT3, OKT4 and all that" (2 September 2004)
		Nicholas Bennett and the "HIV-1 infectious molecular clone" (6 September 2004)
		More on the "HIV" Genome (6 September 2004)
		SH levels alone are predictors of AIDS and mortality (7 September 2004)
		"HIV" "is not sufficient nor necessary" for KS (7 September 2004)
		Cell death, radiation and oxidation (7 September 2004)
		Nicholas Bennett and Montagnier's RT Activity (8 September 2004)
		Requests to Christopher Noble and Nicholas Bennett (8 September 2004)
		CAUSES OF LOW CD4 COUNTS IN AIDS (14 September 2004)
		SEMEN, NITRITES AND KS (17 September 2004)
		MORE ON RADIATION AND OXIDATION (17 September 2004)
		REPEAT, SH LEVELS ALONE ARE PREDICTORS OF AIDS AND MORTALITY (20 September 2004)
		FIVE QUESTIONS TO NICHOLAS BENNETT (21 September 2004)
		More on Nicholas Bennett and Montagnier's RT activity (28 September 2004)
		More on Nicholas Bennett's "HIV" infectious molecular clone (28 September 2004)
		"MECHANISM BY WHICH HIV CAUSES AIDS" (29 September 2004)
		More on CD4s (30 September 2004)
		"HIV" ? "a necessary or sufficient cause" for AIDS? (30 September 2004)
		Diagnosing ?HIV? infection in neonates (30 September 2004)
		PACTG 076 and HIVNET 012 (30 September 2004)
		Repeat, the origin of the CK and RT activity (11 October 2004)
		Questions to Nicholas Bennett and Peter Flegg (11 October 2004)
		Give us the "HIV" "structure", please. (11 October 2004)
		TB, "HIV" antibody tests and AIDS (14 October 2004)
		The "HIV" antibody tests are not diagnostic (14 October 2004)
		"HIV" and PCP (14 October 2004)
		"HIV", Factor VIII and CD4s (14 October 2004)
		"HIV" and AIDS (16 October 2004)
		HHV-8 and KS (18 October 2004)
		Repeat, SHs play a critical role in cell survival following irradiation (18 October 2004)
		Repeat, the "HIV" antibody tests are not diagnostic (20 October 2004)
		Repeat, give us the "HIV" "structure", please (25 October 2004)
		"HIV" necessary for AIDS? (25 October 2004)
		Once again, the origin of the CK and RT cannot be determined by their "RELATIVE amounts" (25 October 2004)
		Yet again, give us the "HIV" structure, please (25 October 2004)
		Yet again on "HIV" and AIDS (25 October 2004)
		HTLV a lentivirus? (25 October 2004)
		PCP and "HIV" (5 November 2004)
		What is the evidence that "HIV" causes PCP? (29 November 2004)
		GIVE US THE EVIDENCE THAT "HIV" DECREASES THE CD4 COUNT (7 December 2004)
		No scientific evidence ? no scientific debate (16 December 2004)
		A question to Brian Foley (13 January 2005)
		Oxidation - the primary cause for AIDS and "HIV" (21 January 2005)
		Clinical trials of antioxidants (21 January 2005)
		More on Oxidation ? the primary cause for AIDS and ?HIV? (1 February 2005)
		When "HIV antibodies" are not "HIV" antibodies (17 February 2005)
		A Summary of Our Debate with Nicholas Bennett (22 March 2005)
		The Predictions of the "HIV" and Oxidative Theories of AIDS (22 March 2005)
		Yet More on Oxidation ? the primary cause for AIDS and ?HIV? (23 March 2005)
		Ozymandias (24 March 2005)
		When "HIV antibodies" are not "HIV" antibodies (1 April 2005)

Allen, Anita L
		A simple question for Brian T Foley (23 March 2004)
		Is Brian T Foley more than virtual? (24 March 2004)
		The predictions based upon the 'HIV/AIDS' hypothesis have been fulfilled (31 January 2005)
		Potatoes, Poppycock and HIV/AIDS (1 February 2005)
		More representative HIV test literature (2 February 2005)

Atkinson, Pennee
		Show me the photo please (20 June 2004)
		A Question for all you Vaccine Researchers (26 July 2004)
		KS risks. (26 July 2004)
		Answers to Pennee Atkinson (11 August 2004)
		In response to Nicholas Bennett (25 August 2004)

Balint, Gabor A.
		Priority of Health Education. (3 March 2003)

Bartlett, Mark
		That is a Scientist's Responsibility (19 February 2004)
		That is a Scientist's Responsibility (23 February 2004)
		That is a Scientist's Responsibility (24 February 2004)
		The serological and nucleic acid tests for HIV-1 and HIV-2 are as good as or better than the tests for any other infection. (22 March 2004)
		Out of all the Responses Four Arguments Have Emerged. Three of These Things are not Like the Other... (25 March 2004)
		Horizontal Transmission ? Reply to Perth (28 March 2004)
		Questions for Christopher Noble & Nicholas Bennett (16 September 2004)
		HIV in Canada and elsewhere (17 September 2004)
		Questions for Christopher Noble & Nicholas Bennett (20 September 2004)
		Questions for Christopher Noble & Nicholas Bennett (20 September 2004)
		Questions for Christopher Noble & Nicholas Bennett (23 September 2004)
		Questions for Peter Flegg (28 September 2004)
		Neonatal HIV (30 September 2004)
		Relative values. (30 September 2004)
		The "HIV" antibody tests are not diagnostic (15 October 2004)
		The "HIV" antibody tests are not diagnostic (20 October 2004)
		The "HIV" antibody tests are not diagnostic (25 October 2004)
		Some Random Comments (28 October 2004)
		Some Random Comments (30 October 2004)
		Request for Peter Flegg (18 November 2004)
		Analysis: the properness of the HIV hypothesis is a media hype (21 March 2005)

Bennett, Nicholas
		HIV EM and purification (28 June 2004)
		HIV EM and purification (1 July 2004)
		Retrovirologists, retroviruses and purification (2 July 2004)
		HIV EM and purification (2 July 2004)
		One AIDS patient will suffice (6 July 2004)
		Notes from Hanz Gelderblom (7 July 2004)
		Where is the virus? (10 July 2004)
		Where is the "HIV-1 infectious molecular clone"? (14 July 2004)
		The HUT 78 cell line (19 July 2004)
		Where are the proper controls in "HIV" research? (20 July 2004)
		The non-existent knobs on "HIV" particles (20 July 2004)
		HIV Tunnel Vision (20 July 2004)
		Reply to Noble: Recreational drugs can cause 'HIV' positivity (20 July 2004)
		HIV Tunnel Vision (21 July 2004)
		KS risks. (21 July 2004)
		MONTAGNIER'S REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE ACTIVITY (26 July 2004)
		WE REPEAT, WHERE IS THE VIRUS? (26 July 2004)
		MONTAGNIER'S REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE ACTIVITY (26 July 2004)
		Answers to Pennee Atkinson (27 July 2004)
		Answers to Pennee Atkinson (17 August 2004)
		KS risks. (17 August 2004)
		Kaposi's Sarcoma and the Perth Group (17 August 2004)
		"HIV" and KS (18 August 2004)
		PubMed searches (20 August 2004)
		"HIV", HHV-8 AND KS (21 August 2004)
		Sezary Syndrome 101 (21 August 2004)
		In response to Nicholas Bennett (26 August 2004)
		In response to Nicholas Bennett (26 August 2004)
		AZT oxidation (31 August 2004)
		CELL DEATH AND OXIDATION (1 September 2004)
		WATER AND SEMEN: THE SAME CARCINOGENIC PROPERTIES? (3 September 2004)
		CD3 CD4 and all the more modern names... (3 September 2004)
		"HIV" and KS (8 September 2004)
		Nicholas Bennett and the "HIV-1 infectious molecular clone" (8 September 2004)
		Various responses to the Perth Group (9 September 2004)
		Nicholas Bennett and Montagnier's RT Activity (9 September 2004)
		Questions for Christopher Noble & Nicholas Bennett (14 September 2004)
		HIV in Canada and elsewhere (16 September 2004)
		Reply to Bennett: 'HIV' is not an STD (17 September 2004)
		HIV in Canada and elsewhere (20 September 2004)
		KS and UV (20 September 2004)
		FIVE QUESTIONS TO NICHOLAS BENNETT (23 September 2004)
		Questions for Peter Flegg (27 September 2004)
		Questions for Peter Flegg (28 September 2004)
		Neonatal HIV (28 September 2004)
		Neonatal HIV (29 September 2004)
		Relative values. (29 September 2004)
		Neonatal HIV (30 September 2004)
		Answers for Nicholas Bennett (1 October 2004)
		Diagnosing ?HIV? infection in neonates (1 October 2004)
		HIV mechanism revisited (2 October 2004)
		Repeat, the origin of the CK and RT activity (11 October 2004)
		HIV - a smoking gun? (12 October 2004)
		Aids and the making of the Public Mind (13 October 2004)
		The "HIV" antibody tests are not diagnostic (15 October 2004)
		Still no in vivo images of 'HIV'! (15 October 2004)
		Still no in vivo images of 'HIV'! (15 October 2004)
		The "HIV" antibody tests are not diagnostic (18 October 2004)
		"HIV" and AIDS (18 October 2004)
		Impossible requests and absence of evidence (18 October 2004)
		HHV-8 and KS (19 October 2004)
		Repeat, the "HIV" antibody tests are not diagnostic in infants, but are fine in adults (20 October 2004)
		The "HIV" antibody tests are not diagnostic (21 October 2004)
		The "HIV" antibody tests are not diagnostic (26 October 2004)
		Aids paradigm timeline (26 October 2004)
		Long Irrelevant yarns are actually hard science. (26 October 2004)
		An appeal to the moderators (26 October 2004)
		timeline and Ho (29 October 2004)
		Some Random Comments (29 October 2004)
		Some Random Comments (30 October 2004)
		Some Random Comments (1 November 2004)
		RE: Nick Bennett: Ho and Pantaleo (1 November 2004)
		It is high time Messrs. Flegg, Floyd, Noble, Bennet, Rumbold rethink the 'HIV/AIDS' hypothesis (16 November 2004)
		Request for Peter Flegg (19 November 2004)
		Source for 99+% accuracy claim (24 November 2004)
		ELISA 'HIV' tests are non-specific and inaccurate (26 November 2004)
		Request for Peter Flegg and Outstanding 'Perth Group' Questions (26 November 2004)
		Response to Gregory Benvenuti (3 December 2004)
		No scientific evidence ? no scientific debate (17 December 2004)
		No scientific evidence ? no scientific debate (20 December 2004)
		Reply to Nicholas Bennett: If 'HIV' really exists it should be visible (3 January 2005)
		Reply to James Whitehead (3 January 2005)
		Does Dr. Peter Flegg still defend the (ab)use of HAART drug regimes and 'HIV' testing? (3 January 2005)
		Reply to Nicholas Bennett: Haemophiliacs prove 'HIV' to be endogenous (6 January 2005)
		Reply to James Whitehead (8 January 2005)
		The politics of AIDS in South Africa: Did Makgatho Mandela die from ARVs? (13 January 2005)
		HIV-1 does not encode glutathione peroxidase. (14 January 2005)
		Oxidation - the primary cause for AIDS and "HIV" (22 January 2005)
		HIV tests (26 January 2005)
		The predictions based upon the 'HIV/AIDS' hypothesis have been fulfilled (26 January 2005)
		The predictions based upon the 'HIV/AIDS' hypothesis have been fulfilled (28 January 2005)
		Activity does not homology make (29 January 2005)
		The predictions based upon the 'HIV/AIDS' hypothesis have been fulfilled (30 January 2005)
		More representative HIV test literature (1 February 2005)
		More on Oxidation ? the primary cause for AIDS and ?HIV? (2 February 2005)
		The predictions based upon the 'HIV/AIDS' hypothesis have been fulfilled (2 February 2005)
		More representative HIV test literature (3 February 2005)
		The predictions based upon the 'HIV/AIDS' hypothesis have been fulfilled (4 February 2005)
		Can Bennett isolate 'HIV' via de Harven's methodology? (7 February 2005)
		More on Oxidation ? the primary cause for AIDS and ?HIV? (7 February 2005)
		More on Oxidation ? the primary cause for AIDS and ?HIV? (8 February 2005)
		Reply to Floyd: 'HIV' Fundamentalists are today's 'Flat Earthers' (8 February 2005)
		Will Bennett now isolate 'HIV' via de Harven's methodology? (9 February 2005)
		Clinical trials of antioxidants (15 February 2005)
		Clinical trials of antioxidants - erratum (16 February 2005)
		Can Bennett at last now isolate 'HIV' via de Harven's methodology? (17 February 2005)
		Clinical trials of antioxidants (17 February 2005)
		Clinical trials of antioxidants (18 February 2005)
		Reply to Morrell: Regarding 'endogenous entities' and 'epiphenomena' (19 February 2005)
		Reply to Morrell: Regarding 'endogenous entities' and 'epiphenomena' (21 February 2005)
		Reply to Flegg regarding 'retroviruses' (4 March 2005)
		Analysis: the properness of the HIV hypothesis is a media hype (18 March 2005)
		Analysis: the properness of the HIV hypothesis is a media hype (21 March 2005)
		Analysis: the properness of the HIV hypothesis is a media hype (21 March 2005)
		Let them be (23 March 2005)
		Yet More on Oxidation ? the primary cause for AIDS and ?HIV? (23 March 2005)
		Yet More on Oxidation ? the primary cause for AIDS and ?HIV? (24 March 2005)
		Analysis: the properness of the HIV hypothesis is a media hype (24 March 2005)
		Reply to Bennett: No evidence for 'HIV' directly killing T cells (27 March 2005)
		Yet More on Oxidation ? the primary cause for AIDS and ?HIV? (30 March 2005)
		Reply to Bennett: Why 'HIV' is a misinterpreted 'HERV' (31 March 2005)
		Yet More on Oxidation ? the primary cause for AIDS and ?HIV? (1 April 2005)
		Reply to Russell's points (4 April 2005)
		See what one wants... (7 April 2005)
		See what one wants... (14 April 2005)

Benvenuti, Gregory P
		Request for Peter Flegg and Outstanding 'Perth Group' Questions (24 November 2004)
		Request for Peter Flegg and Outstanding 'Perth Group' Questions (1 December 2004)
		Response to Gregory Benvenuti (8 December 2004)
		Clinical trials of antioxidants (17 February 2005)

Bogaert, Louis-Jacques van
		ART and Political Will (12 March 2003)

Bond, Jim
		HIV in Southern Africa: social and political factors are very relevant, but so is the virus itself! (3 March 2003)

Brink, Anthony
		HIV in South Africa (13 March 2003)
		Low rates of heterosexual transmission and the HIV theory of AIDS (24 March 2003)

Causer, David
		HIV in South Africa (13 March 2003)
		Low rates of heterosexual transmission and the HIV theory of AIDS (24 March 2003)
		Is There Proof for Heterosexual Transmission of HIV? (27 March 2003)
		Clarification of the basic issues in relation to the HIV theory of AIDS (1 April 2003)
		Assumptions and opinions do not prove heterosexual transmission of HIV (15 April 2003)
		A critical examination of the evidence for the existence of HIV (25 April 2003)
		Let?s critically analyse data instead of merely reading and quoting abstracts (1 May 2003)
		Yes. It is about time to move on. (5 May 2003)
		Where are the experiments which prove HIV isolation, sexual transmission and antibody specificity? (22 May 2003)
		Unravelling the truth (27 May 2003)
		A simple request from the Perth Group (5 June 2003)
		The request remains the same and is still pure and simple (12 June 2003)
		Where is the proof for HIV purification by any method? (19 June 2003)
		Distinguishing between true and "official" HIV infection (20 June 2003)
		We repeat: ?Where is the proof for HIV purification by any method?" (26 June 2003)
		A plea for the references on HIV purification (3 July 2003)
		A further plea for references on HIV purification (9 July 2003)
		Distinguishing between true and "official" HIV infection (12 July 2003)
		?HIV? genome, clones and sequences (18 July 2003)
		The "HIV" and influenza A virus genomes (26 July 2003)
		"HIV" genomic variations (31 July 2003)
		Politics vs. science. (5 August 2003)
		A plea to Christopher Noble (8 August 2003)
		The Perth Group answer to Christopher Noble (21 August 2003)
		Finding wood among the trees (22 September 2003)
		Questions and Answers (13 October 2003)
		Genomic Variability (14 October 2003)
		Divergent HIV strains and antibody tests (16 October 2003)
		gp41 (20 October 2003)
		More On Genomic Variability (23 October 2003)
		Did Montagnier prove the existence of HIV? (4 November 2003)
		More on "HIV" gp41 (25 November 2003)
		Perth Group responses to Brian Foley (25 November 2003)
		Perth Group Responses to Christopher Noble (25 November 2003)
		Has Montagnier discovered the Human Immunodeficiency Virus? (25 November 2003)
		Is there proof of a correlation between the "HIV" antibody and PCR tests and what may underlie such a correlation? (11 December 2003)
		Will Christopher Noble please post his analysis of the 1983 Montagnier Science paper (19 December 2003)
		More on the specificity of PCR and its correlation with the antibody test (19 December 2003)
		Basic requests which remain unanswered by Brian Foley and Christopher Noble (24 December 2003)
		Perth Group response to Murali Mohan Chakkilala (16 January 2004)
		Still no proof for a correlation between the HIV PCR and antibody tests (6 February 2004)
		More responses to Christopher Noble (24 February 2004)
		Perth Group response to Peter Flegg (26 February 2004)
		Perth Group response to Christopher Noble (26 February 2004)
		What is the Perth group's stand? (4 March 2004)
		More responses to Christopher Noble (9 March 2004)
		Basic requests which remain unanswered by Brian Foley and Christopher Noble (23 March 2004)
		Horizontal Transmission ? (23 March 2004)
		Perth Group reasoning (26 March 2004)
		Further response to James Parker (1 April 2004)
		What part of "infectious molecular clone" do you fail to understand? (4 April 2004)
		A second response to Christopher Noble's "What part of "infectious molecular clone" do you fail to understand?" (8 April 2004)
		A reasonable request to the ?HIV?/AIDS experts (20 April 2004)
		The reasonable request to the ?HIV?/AIDS experts still remains (23 April 2004)
		What ?infectious molecular clone of HIV? means? (28 April 2004)
		Two questions to Brian Foley (28 April 2004)
		Our basic requests to Brian Foley and Christopher Noble remain still unanswered (29 April 2004)
		Questions to Peter Flegg which remain still unanswered (30 April 2004)
		Two questions to Brian Foley (4 May 2004)
		Further response to James Parker FeLV Horizontal Transmission (6 May 2004)
		Two questions to Brian Foley (6 May 2004)
		Re-phrasing our two questions to Brian Foley (11 May 2004)
		A QUESTION AND A REQUEST TO BRIAN FOLEY (12 May 2004)
		A paraphrased request and a question to Brian Foley (14 May 2004)
		Eight simple questions and a repeated request to Brian Foley (24 May 2004)
		Twelve simple questions to Brian Foley (31 May 2004)
		One simple question for the Perth Group. (4 June 2004)
		New and repeated questions and requests to Brian Foley (8 June 2004)
		Did Montagnier discover HIV in 1983? (24 June 2004)
		More on the photo (25 June 2004)
		An oft repeated question to Brian Foley and Christopher Noble (28 June 2004)
		Retrovirologists, retroviruses and purification (1 July 2004)
		Without the ?HIV? genome (poly (A)-RNA banding at 1.16 g/ml) there can be no probes or molecular clones (1 July 2004)
		What is Christopher Noble?s method for proving the existence of a new retrovirus? (6 July 2004)
		One AIDS patient will suffice (6 July 2004)
		We repeat our request: What is Christopher Noble?s method of proving the existence of a new retrovirus? (9 July 2004)
		Where is the virus? (9 July 2004)
		Where is the virus? (14 July 2004)
		Again we ask Christopher Noble to tell us his method of proving the existence of a new retrovirus (14 July 2004)
		The HUT 78 cell line (15 July 2004)
		Where are the proper controls in "HIV" research? (19 July 2004)
		The non-existent knobs on "HIV" particles (19 July 2004)
		MONTAGNIER'S REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE ACTIVITY (23 July 2004)
		WE REPEAT, WHERE IS THE VIRUS? (23 July 2004)
		NICHOLAS BENNETT'S INTERPRETATION OF RICHIERI ET AL (23 July 2004)
		THE CELL LINES HUT102 AND HUT78 (5 August 2004)
		Is oxidation necessary for activation? (17 August 2004)
		Still no proper controls in HIV research (17 August 2004)
		Is oxidation of "HIV" the critical factor? (17 August 2004)
		Is "HIV" sufficient or necessary for T4 cell decrease (AID)? (17 August 2004)
		"HIV" and KS (17 August 2004)
		"HIV", HHV-8 AND KS (20 August 2004)
		Where is the evidence for the existence of the "HIV" genome (20 August 2004)
		Where is the evidence that "HIV" is causally related to KS? (20 August 2004)
		HUT-78 AND HTLV (31 August 2004)
		CELL DEATH AND OXIDATION (31 August 2004)
		A REQUEST TO NICHOLAS BENNETT, CHRISTOPHER NOBLE (31 August 2004)
		THREE REQUESTS TO PETER FLEGG (31 August 2004)
		IS OUR ANALYSIS OF THE ZAGURY PAPER (31 August 2004)
		WATER AND SEMEN: THE SAME CARCINOGENIC PROPERTIES? (2 September 2004)
		"OKT3, OKT4 and all that" (2 September 2004)
		Nicholas Bennett and the "HIV-1 infectious molecular clone" (6 September 2004)
		More on the "HIV" Genome (6 September 2004)
		SH levels alone are predictors of AIDS and mortality (7 September 2004)
		"HIV" "is not sufficient nor necessary" for KS (7 September 2004)
		Cell death, radiation and oxidation (7 September 2004)
		Nicholas Bennett and Montagnier's RT Activity (8 September 2004)
		Requests to Christopher Noble and Nicholas Bennett (8 September 2004)
		CAUSES OF LOW CD4 COUNTS IN AIDS (14 September 2004)
		SEMEN, NITRITES AND KS (17 September 2004)
		MORE ON RADIATION AND OXIDATION (17 September 2004)
		REPEAT, SH LEVELS ALONE ARE PREDICTORS OF AIDS AND MORTALITY (20 September 2004)
		FIVE QUESTIONS TO NICHOLAS BENNETT (21 September 2004)
		More on Nicholas Bennett and Montagnier's RT activity (28 September 2004)
		More on Nicholas Bennett's "HIV" infectious molecular clone (28 September 2004)
		"MECHANISM BY WHICH HIV CAUSES AIDS" (29 September 2004)
		More on CD4s (30 September 2004)
		"HIV" ? "a necessary or sufficient cause" for AIDS? (30 September 2004)
		Diagnosing ?HIV? infection in neonates (30 September 2004)
		PACTG 076 and HIVNET 012 (30 September 2004)
		Repeat, the origin of the CK and RT activity (11 October 2004)
		Questions to Nicholas Bennett and Peter Flegg (11 October 2004)
		Give us the "HIV" "structure", please. (11 October 2004)
		TB, "HIV" antibody tests and AIDS (14 October 2004)
		The "HIV" antibody tests are not diagnostic (14 October 2004)
		"HIV" and PCP (14 October 2004)
		"HIV", Factor VIII and CD4s (14 October 2004)
		"HIV" and AIDS (16 October 2004)
		HHV-8 and KS (18 October 2004)
		Repeat, SHs play a critical role in cell survival following irradiation (18 October 2004)
		Repeat, the "HIV" antibody tests are not diagnostic (20 October 2004)
		Repeat, give us the "HIV" "structure", please (25 October 2004)
		"HIV" necessary for AIDS? (25 October 2004)
		Once again, the origin of the CK and RT cannot be determined by their "RELATIVE amounts" (25 October 2004)
		Yet again, give us the "HIV" structure, please (25 October 2004)
		Yet again on "HIV" and AIDS (25 October 2004)
		HTLV a lentivirus? (25 October 2004)
		PCP and "HIV" (5 November 2004)
		What is the evidence that "HIV" causes PCP? (29 November 2004)
		GIVE US THE EVIDENCE THAT "HIV" DECREASES THE CD4 COUNT (7 December 2004)
		No scientific evidence ? no scientific debate (16 December 2004)
		A question to Brian Foley (13 January 2005)
		Oxidation - the primary cause for AIDS and "HIV" (21 January 2005)
		Clinical trials of antioxidants (21 January 2005)
		More on Oxidation ? the primary cause for AIDS and ?HIV? (1 February 2005)
		When "HIV antibodies" are not "HIV" antibodies (17 February 2005)
		A Summary of Our Debate with Nicholas Bennett (22 March 2005)
		The Predictions of the "HIV" and Oxidative Theories of AIDS (22 March 2005)
		Yet More on Oxidation ? the primary cause for AIDS and ?HIV? (23 March 2005)
		Ozymandias (24 March 2005)
		When "HIV antibodies" are not "HIV" antibodies (1 April 2005)

Chakkilala, Murali Mohan
		The Perth Group "answer" to Christopher Noble (17 September 2003)
		A request to the Perth group (1 January 2004)
		Perth Group response to Murali Mohan Chakkilala (20 January 2004)

Cooper, Ed
		Time for the end of AIDS (18 March 2003)
		Perth Group Responses to Christopher Noble (26 November 2003)
		A simple question for Brian T Foley (24 March 2004)

Cox, Caroline
		1.1 An appeal for patient rights and health to take precedence over HIV tunnel vision ( combos and or nothing strategy ) Plus a new petition. (7 December 2003)

D'Sa, Alistair
		What is the Perth group's stand? (22 February 2004)
		A New Way of Referencing Might Help Reduce Complaints About the AIDS Denialists... (10 April 2004)

David
		What are appropriate methodologies in retrovirology? (13 July 2004)
		Where is the "HIV-1 infectious molecular clone"? (13 July 2004)

Davies, Clive
		HIV (25 April 2004)

Engelbrecht, Torsten
		Analysis: the properness of the HIV hypothesis is a media hype (17 March 2005)
		Analysis: the properness of the HIV hypothesis is a media hype (21 March 2005)
		Analysis: the properness of the HIV hypothesis is a media hype (24 March 2005)
		Analysis: the properness of the HIV hypothesis is a media hype (1 April 2005)

Evans, Jeffrey
		The Perth Group "answer" - Questions for Noble and/or Foley (6 September 2003)
		A Letter and a Request to Dr. Luc Montagnier (10 April 2005)

Evans, Jeffrey L
		A plea to Eleni Papadopulos-Eleopulos (18 August 2003)
		A plea to Eleni Papadopulos-Eleopulos (19 August 2003)
		A plea to Eleni Papadopulos-Eleopulos (20 August 2003)
		Reply to Bennett: Gay AIDS-KS is caused by poppers (3 April 2005)

Fassin, Didier
		The reality of AIDS in South Africa (2 March 2003)

Feinberg, Louis
		In fact, INCREDIBLE as it may sound, he acknowledged nothing of relevance to your enduringly specious arguments... (24 October 2003)
		Bess Continues to Have no Problem Telling Microvesicles from HIV. Why Have You Gone So Far Without Looking at the Rest of His Work? (24 October 2003)
		Out of all the Responses Four Arguments Have Emerged. Three of These Things are not Like the Other... (25 March 2004)
		Questions That Should Remain Unanswered by Peter Flegg (1 May 2004)
		What is Christopher Noble?s method for proving the existence of a new retrovirus? (6 July 2004)
		Mice May Have Good Reason to Fear Male Pigs (29 September 2004)
		Mice May Have Good Reason to Fear Male Pigs (30 September 2004)
		Mice May Have Good Reason to Fear Male Pigs (30 September 2004)
		A Selection of Questions Recently not Answered by the 'Perth Group' (18 October 2004)
		Pneumocystis. Is it a Protozoan or a Fungus? Does it exist at all according to 'PG' isolation criteria? (19 October 2004)
		"HIV", Factor VIII and CD4s (20 October 2004)
		"HIV", Factor VIII and CD4s (20 October 2004)
		Suggestions That Respondents Provide a Consistent and Cogent Argument Should Not Be 'Disturbing' (21 October 2004)
		PCP and "HIV" (6 November 2004)
		Request for Peter Flegg and Outstanding 'Perth Group' Questions (24 November 2004)
		The Appeal of the Underdog and Unwillingess of the 'Perth Group' to Engage in Debate... (11 December 2004)

Feliciello, MC
		Setting ground rules for genomics is not exactly a rapid response (16 October 2003)

Fenton, Theo HM
		Let them be (22 March 2005)
		Let them be (23 March 2005)

Fiala, Christian
		HIV in South Africa (13 March 2003)
		More responses to Christopher Noble (24 February 2004)
		Perth Group response to Peter Flegg (26 February 2004)
		Perth Group response to Christopher Noble (26 February 2004)
		What is the Perth group's stand? (4 March 2004)
		More responses to Christopher Noble (9 March 2004)
		Basic requests which remain unanswered by Brian Foley and Christopher Noble (23 March 2004)
		Horizontal Transmission ? (23 March 2004)
		Perth Group reasoning (26 March 2004)
		Further response to James Parker (1 April 2004)
		What part of "infectious molecular clone" do you fail to understand? (4 April 2004)
		A second response to Christopher Noble's "What part of "infectious molecular clone" do you fail to understand?" (8 April 2004)
		A reasonable request to the ?HIV?/AIDS experts (20 April 2004)
		The reasonable request to the ?HIV?/AIDS experts still remains (23 April 2004)
		What ?infectious molecular clone of HIV? means? (28 April 2004)
		Two questions to Brian Foley (28 April 2004)
		Questions to Peter Flegg which remain still unanswered (30 April 2004)
		Two questions to Brian Foley (4 May 2004)
		Further response to James Parker FeLV Horizontal Transmission (6 May 2004)
		Two questions to Brian Foley (6 May 2004)
		Re-phrasing our two questions to Brian Foley (11 May 2004)
		A QUESTION AND A REQUEST TO BRIAN FOLEY (12 May 2004)
		A paraphrased request and a question to Brian Foley (14 May 2004)
		Eight simple questions and a repeated request to Brian Foley (24 May 2004)
		Twelve simple questions to Brian Foley (31 May 2004)
		One simple question for the Perth Group. (4 June 2004)
		New and repeated questions and requests to Brian Foley (8 June 2004)
		Did Montagnier discover HIV in 1983? (24 June 2004)
		More on the photo (25 June 2004)
		An oft repeated question to Brian Foley and Christopher Noble (28 June 2004)
		Retrovirologists, retroviruses and purification (1 July 2004)
		Without the ?HIV? genome (poly (A)-RNA banding at 1.16 g/ml) there can be no probes or molecular clones (1 July 2004)
		What is Christopher Noble?s method for proving the existence of a new retrovirus? (6 July 2004)
		One AIDS patient will suffice (6 July 2004)
		We repeat our request: What is Christopher Noble?s method of proving the existence of a new retrovirus? (9 July 2004)
		Where is the virus? (9 July 2004)
		Where is the virus? (14 July 2004)
		Again we ask Christopher Noble to tell us his method of proving the existence of a new retrovirus (14 July 2004)
		The HUT 78 cell line (15 July 2004)
		Where are the proper controls in "HIV" research? (19 July 2004)
		The non-existent knobs on "HIV" particles (19 July 2004)
		MONTAGNIER'S REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE ACTIVITY (23 July 2004)
		WE REPEAT, WHERE IS THE VIRUS? (23 July 2004)
		NICHOLAS BENNETT'S INTERPRETATION OF RICHIERI ET AL (23 July 2004)
		THE CELL LINES HUT102 AND HUT78 (5 August 2004)
		Is oxidation necessary for activation? (17 August 2004)
		Still no proper controls in HIV research (17 August 2004)
		Is oxidation of "HIV" the critical factor? (17 August 2004)
		Is "HIV" sufficient or necessary for T4 cell decrease (AID)? (17 August 2004)
		"HIV" and KS (17 August 2004)
		"HIV", HHV-8 AND KS (20 August 2004)
		Where is the evidence for the existence of the "HIV" genome (20 August 2004)
		Where is the evidence that "HIV" is causally related to KS? (20 August 2004)
		HUT-78 AND HTLV (31 August 2004)
		CELL DEATH AND OXIDATION (31 August 2004)
		A REQUEST TO NICHOLAS BENNETT, CHRISTOPHER NOBLE (31 August 2004)
		THREE REQUESTS TO PETER FLEGG (31 August 2004)
		IS OUR ANALYSIS OF THE ZAGURY PAPER (31 August 2004)
		WATER AND SEMEN: THE SAME CARCINOGENIC PROPERTIES? (2 September 2004)
		"OKT3, OKT4 and all that" (2 September 2004)
		Nicholas Bennett and the "HIV-1 infectious molecular clone" (6 September 2004)
		More on the "HIV" Genome (6 September 2004)
		SH levels alone are predictors of AIDS and mortality (7 September 2004)
		"HIV" "is not sufficient nor necessary" for KS (7 September 2004)
		Cell death, radiation and oxidation (7 September 2004)
		Nicholas Bennett and Montagnier's RT Activity (8 September 2004)
		Requests to Christopher Noble and Nicholas Bennett (8 September 2004)
		CAUSES OF LOW CD4 COUNTS IN AIDS (14 September 2004)
		SEMEN, NITRITES AND KS (17 September 2004)
		MORE ON RADIATION AND OXIDATION (17 September 2004)
		REPEAT, SH LEVELS ALONE ARE PREDICTORS OF AIDS AND MORTALITY (20 September 2004)
		FIVE QUESTIONS TO NICHOLAS BENNETT (21 September 2004)
		More on Nicholas Bennett and Montagnier's RT activity (28 September 2004)
		More on Nicholas Bennett's "HIV" infectious molecular clone (28 September 2004)
		"MECHANISM BY WHICH HIV CAUSES AIDS" (29 September 2004)
		More on CD4s (30 September 2004)
		"HIV" ? "a necessary or sufficient cause" for AIDS? (30 September 2004)
		Diagnosing ?HIV? infection in neonates (30 September 2004)
		PACTG 076 and HIVNET 012 (30 September 2004)
		Repeat, the origin of the CK and RT activity (11 October 2004)
		Questions to Nicholas Bennett and Peter Flegg (11 October 2004)
		Give us the "HIV" "structure", please. (11 October 2004)
		TB, "HIV" antibody tests and AIDS (14 October 2004)
		The "HIV" antibody tests are not diagnostic (14 October 2004)
		"HIV" and PCP (14 October 2004)
		"HIV", Factor VIII and CD4s (14 October 2004)
		"HIV" and AIDS (16 October 2004)
		HHV-8 and KS (18 October 2004)
		Repeat, SHs play a critical role in cell survival following irradiation (18 October 2004)
		Repeat, the "HIV" antibody tests are not diagnostic (20 October 2004)
		Repeat, give us the "HIV" "structure", please (25 October 2004)
		"HIV" necessary for AIDS? (25 October 2004)
		Once again, the origin of the CK and RT cannot be determined by their "RELATIVE amounts" (25 October 2004)
		Yet again, give us the "HIV" structure, please (25 October 2004)
		Yet again on "HIV" and AIDS (25 October 2004)
		HTLV a lentivirus? (25 October 2004)
		PCP and "HIV" (5 November 2004)
		What is the evidence that "HIV" causes PCP? (29 November 2004)
		GIVE US THE EVIDENCE THAT "HIV" DECREASES THE CD4 COUNT (7 December 2004)
		No scientific evidence ? no scientific debate (16 December 2004)
		A question to Brian Foley (13 January 2005)
		Oxidation - the primary cause for AIDS and "HIV" (21 January 2005)
		Clinical trials of antioxidants (21 January 2005)
		More on Oxidation ? the primary cause for AIDS and ?HIV? (1 February 2005)
		When "HIV antibodies" are not "HIV" antibodies (17 February 2005)
		A Summary of Our Debate with Nicholas Bennett (22 March 2005)
		The Predictions of the "HIV" and Oxidative Theories of AIDS (22 March 2005)
		Yet More on Oxidation ? the primary cause for AIDS and ?HIV? (23 March 2005)
		Ozymandias (24 March 2005)
		When "HIV antibodies" are not "HIV" antibodies (1 April 2005)

Fiddian-Green, Richard G
		The priority should be to preserve humanity (1 March 2003)
		Killing the geese that lay the golden eggs (2 March 2003)

Flegg, Peter J
		More reasons for low heterosexual transmission in the Padian study (30 March 2003)
		For some people its April Fool's day all year round (3 April 2003)
		Sexual transmission of HIV during early infection (10 April 2003)
		Drifting in a state of denialist déjà vu. (18 April 2003)
		Misquotations (18 April 2003)
		Comments and an Analysis of Flegg's reference number 1 (18 April 2003)
		Conspiracy indeed! (19 April 2003)
		Critical appraisal of evidence - does the BMJ have a vacancy? (25 April 2003)
		Does sexual intercourse result in pregnancy? (2 May 2003)
		The politics of AIDS in South Africa (14 May 2003)
		"If it makes you feel good....." (17 May 2003)
		H2O toxicity (2 July 2003)
		H2O toxicity (7 July 2003)
		Risk/benefit of HIV therapy (10 July 2003)
		A plea not to "sex up" the data on toxicities (18 July 2003)
		Liver deaths and HAART - the truth. (18 July 2003)
		Benefits of treatment - response to C. Tyler. (31 July 2003)
		Brian Foley's curiosity (26 September 2003)
		That is a Scientist's Responsibility (20 February 2004)
		Misinformation on HIV and its consequences (2 March 2004)
		Perth Group reasoning (2 March 2004)
		The causes of AIDS and other diseases (12 July 2004)
		KS risks. (27 July 2004)
		Kaposi's Sarcoma and the Perth Group (18 August 2004)
		More research misrepresentations (31 August 2004)
		CAUSES OF LOW CD4 COUNTS IN AIDS - a question to the Perth Group (14 September 2004)
		Questions for Christopher Noble & Nicholas Bennett (16 September 2004)
		Questions for Christopher Noble & Nicholas Bennett (21 September 2004)
		Questions for Christopher Noble & Nicholas Bennett (24 September 2004)
		Neonatal HIV (30 September 2004)
		"HIV" ? "a necessary or sufficient cause" for AIDS? (30 September 2004)
		More on CD4s (30 September 2004)
		Neonatal HIV (8 October 2004)
		Questions to Nicholas Bennett and Peter Flegg (11 October 2004)
		"HIV" and PCP (18 October 2004)
		"HIV", Factor VIII and CD4s (19 October 2004)
		Repeat, the "HIV" antibody tests are not diagnostic (21 October 2004)
		Some Random Comments (29 October 2004)
		Reply to Russell - What Stephan Lanka actually said. (29 October 2004)
		Some Random Comments (1 November 2004)
		Some Random Comments (4 November 2004)
		Request for the Perth Group (9 November 2004)
		PCP and "HIV" (9 November 2004)
		Request for Peter Flegg (10 November 2004)
		Request for Peter Flegg and Outstanding 'Perth Group' Questions (23 November 2004)
		Source for 99+% accuracy claim (24 November 2004)
		Request for Peter Flegg and Outstanding 'Perth Group' Questions (26 November 2004)
		What is the evidence that "HIV" causes PCP? (8 December 2004)
		GIVE US THE EVIDENCE THAT "HIV" DECREASES THE CD4 COUNT (8 December 2004)
		Response to Gregory Benvenuti (11 December 2004)
		No scientific evidence ? no scientific debate (17 December 2004)
		Makgatho Mandela's death (21 January 2005)
		Oxidation - the primary cause for AIDS and "HIV" (25 January 2005)
		HIV diagnostics (1 February 2005)
		Reply to Morrell: Regarding 'endogenous entities' and 'epiphenomena' (21 February 2005)
		When "HIV antibodies" are not "HIV" antibodies (21 February 2005)
		Peter Flegg grossly misrepresented Stefan Lanka out of context (25 February 2005)

Floyd, Tony
		Studies showing LOW rates of heterosexual transmission do not support alternative AIDS theories... (15 March 2003)
		Neither Padian, Gisselquist or Brody provide any reason to believe HIV isn't sexually transmitted... (26 March 2003)
		Heterosexual anal intercourse. A severely underestimated mode of HIV transmission? (28 March 2003)
		Most Experts Suggest 90% of African Adult HIV is from heterosexual transmission, Gisselquist 30% (5 April 2003)
		Heterosexual Intercourse Found to be the Major Mode of HIV Transmission in a Group of Thai Fisherman (7 April 2003)
		Use of CONDOMS for heterosexual intercourse is HIGHLY EFFECTIVE IN PREVENTING HIV TRANSMISSION...... (17 April 2003)
		CONSPIRACY THEORY??? (23 April 2003)
		The Piatak Study CONFIRMS the Link Between HIV and Disease AND Shows Antiretroviral Drug Efficacy... (28 April 2003)
		Forget HIV/AIDS, is there sufficient evidence to prove that LIFE is sexually transmitted???????????? (29 April 2003)
		Time to Put Padian to Bed Before Moving on to Other Authors Who Have Been Misrepresented (4 May 2003)
		No Matter How You Twist Mr Gisselquist, He Does Not Support Alternative AIDS Theories. (7 May 2003)
		Your argument has more holes in it than something full of holes used for comparative purposes. (8 May 2003)
		Condoms and Partner Choice are Important in Containing HIV (29 May 2003)
		Manipulations and misrepresentation of scientific facts only serve to fuel HIV/AIDS (30 May 2003)
		Faster Progression to AIDS and Death Occurs in Those With Higher Levels of HIV VIRUS (4 June 2003)
		If It's Good Enough for RSV, Then It is Good Enough for HIV. (24 June 2003)
		Does the Rous Sarcoma Virus and Moloney Murine Sarcoma Virus also therefore NOT EXIST??? (1 July 2003)
		Matthias Egger's Study Found up to 65% Reduction in Mortality With Antretroviral Drugs (11 July 2003)
		If it walks, talks and quacks like HIV, then it probably is HIV. (13 July 2003)
		HIV Denial Has Not Progressed One Bit. (14 October 2003)
		What motivates them??? (16 October 2003)
		In fact, INCREDIBLE as it may sound, he acknowledged nothing of relevance to your enduringly specious arguments... (24 October 2003)
		Bess Continues to Have no Problem Telling Microvesicles from HIV. Why Have You Gone So Far Without Looking at the Rest of His Work? (24 October 2003)
		South African Government is moving ahead with anti-retroviral drugs. (20 November 2003)
		Out of all the Responses Four Arguments Have Emerged. Three of These Things are not Like the Other... (24 March 2004)
		Out of all the Responses Four Arguments Have Emerged. Three of These Things are not Like the Other... (25 March 2004)
		A New Way of Referencing Might Help Reduce Complaints About the AIDS Denialists... (7 April 2004)
		Questions That Should Remain Unanswered by Peter Flegg (1 May 2004)
		The surfaces of HIV particles exhibit "tufts" of protein (1 July 2004)
		Time Travel and HIV (1 July 2004)
		What is Christopher Noble?s method for proving the existence of a new retrovirus? (6 July 2004)
		Don't Let Inconsistent Denialists Get the 'Bess' of you... (21 July 2004)
		Differentiating a Vaccinated Individual from an Infected Individual (28 July 2004)
		Valerie Beral Said No Such Thing. The 'Perth Group' Need to Make This More of a Challenge. (22 August 2004)
		Levy now studies HIV's ability to be transmitted and to induce disease. (16 September 2004)
		Mice May Have Good Reason to Fear Male Pigs (17 September 2004)
		Mice May Have Good Reason to Fear Male Pigs (29 September 2004)
		Mice May Have Good Reason to Fear Male Pigs (30 September 2004)
		Mice May Have Good Reason to Fear Male Pigs (30 September 2004)
		A Selection of Questions Recently not Answered by the 'Perth Group' (18 October 2004)
		Pneumocystis. Is it a Protozoan or a Fungus? Does it exist at all according to 'PG' isolation criteria? (19 October 2004)
		"HIV", Factor VIII and CD4s (20 October 2004)
		"HIV", Factor VIII and CD4s (20 October 2004)
		Suggestions That Respondents Provide a Consistent and Cogent Argument Should Not Be 'Disturbing' (21 October 2004)
		PCP and "HIV" (6 November 2004)
		Request for Peter Flegg (12 November 2004)
		Request for Peter Flegg and Outstanding 'Perth Group' Questions (18 November 2004)
		Request for Peter Flegg and Outstanding 'Perth Group' Questions (24 November 2004)
		Request for Peter Flegg and Outstanding 'Perth Group' Questions (26 November 2004)
		The Appeal of the Underdog and Unwillingess of the 'Perth Group' to Engage in Debate... (11 December 2004)
		Potatoes, Poppycock and HIV/AIDS (31 January 2005)
		More misrepresentation of experts by the alt-AIDS group??? (3 February 2005)
		Reply to Tony Floyd: requested Philip Mortimer reference (6 February 2005)
		Galileo and alt-AIDS (8 February 2005)
		Galileo and alt-AIDS (11 February 2005)
		A Medical Hypothesis is just that (18 February 2005)
		Let them be (23 March 2005)

Floyd, Tony G
		The Appeal of the Underdog and Unwillingess of the 'Perth Group' to Engage in Debate... (13 December 2004)

Foley, Brian
		HIV - a smoking gun? (12 October 2004)

Foley, Brian T
		Where are the experiments which prove HIV isolation, sexual transmission and antibody specificit (23 May 2003)
		A modest proposal (1 June 2003)
		Who studies healthy HIV positives ? (4 June 2003)
		A modest proposal (5 June 2003)
		A simple request from the Perth Group (6 June 2003)
		The request remains the same and is still pure and simple (12 June 2003)
		Where is the proof for HIV purification by any method? (26 June 2003)
		Where is the proof for HIV purification by any method? (27 June 2003)
		Distinguishing between true and "official" HIV infection (27 June 2003)
		A plea for the references on HIV purification (3 July 2003)
		A further plea for references on HIV purification (10 July 2003)
		Which brings us back to politics? (25 July 2003)
		Politics vs. science. (31 July 2003)
		HIV is not the only exogenous retrovirus. (19 August 2003)
		RE: Politics vs. Science (5 September 2003)
		The Perth Group answer to Christopher Noble (5 September 2003)
		The Perth Group "answer" - Questions for Noble and/or Foley (9 September 2003)
		A critical examination of the evidence for the existence of HIV (20 September 2003)
		Finding wood among the trees (25 September 2003)
		Finding wood among the trees (25 September 2003)
		More On Genomic Variability (1 November 2003)
		Genomic Variability (1 November 2003)
		The evolution of RNA viruses. (4 November 2003)
		The Politics of AIDS in South Africa: (6 November 2003)
		Mutations in HIV proteins do indeed sometimes alter function. (8 November 2003)
		The serological and nucleic acid tests for HIV-1 and HIV-2 are as good as or better than the tests for any other infection. (18 March 2004)
		You can't trust everything you read on the Internet (22 March 2004)
		A simple question for Brian T Foley (24 March 2004)
		Out of all the Responses Four Arguments Have Emerged. Three of These Things are not Like the Other... (24 March 2004)
		Yet another HIV test FDA-approved: March 24, 2004 (25 March 2004)
		A second response to Christopher Noble's "What part of "infectious molecular clone" do you fail to understand?" (20 April 2004)
		A reasonable request to the ?HIV?/AIDS experts (21 April 2004)
		Two questions to Brian Foley (29 April 2004)
		Two questions to Brian Foley (29 April 2004)
		Two questions to Brian Foley (4 May 2004)
		Two questions to Brian Foley (6 May 2004)
		Questions That Should Remain Unanswered by Peter Flegg (6 May 2004)
		Two questions to Brian Foley (6 May 2004)
		Some history on work done by the Gallo and Montagnier groups, 1982-1985. (6 May 2004)
		Re-phrasing our two questions to Brian Foley (11 May 2004)
		A QUESTION AND A REQUEST TO BRIAN FOLEY (13 May 2004)
		A paraphrased request and a question to Brian Foley (14 May 2004)
		Eight simple questions and a repeated request to Brian Foley (25 May 2004)
		Eight simple questions and a repeated request to Brian Foley (26 May 2004)
		Eight simple questions and a repeated request to Brian Foley (28 May 2004)
		A comment on the size of cultures used for harvesting viruses. (28 May 2004)
		Twelve simple questions to Brian Foley (2 June 2004)
		The methods used to clone HIV are the same ones used to clone other retroviruses. (5 June 2004)
		New and repeated questions and requests to Brian Foley (8 June 2004)
		Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. (8 June 2004)
		Show me the photo please (24 June 2004)
		Did Montagnier discover HIV in 1983? (24 June 2004)
		More on the photo (25 June 2004)
		gp120 lost in centrifugation (25 June 2004)
		Retrovirologists, retroviruses and purification (2 July 2004)
		Without the ?HIV? genome (poly (A)-RNA banding at 1.16 g/ml) there can be no probes or molecular clones (2 July 2004)
		Give us the "HIV" "structure", please. (13 October 2004)
		An appeal to the moderators (26 October 2004)
		Source for 99+% accuracy claim (24 November 2004)
		HIV-1 does not encode glutathione peroxidase. (11 January 2005)
		The predictions based upon the 'HIV/AIDS' hypothesis have been fulfilled (28 January 2005)

Foley, Brian T.
		Basic requests which remain unanswered by Brian Foley and Christopher Noble (23 March 2004)

Foster, Harold D.
		AIDS in South Africa:The Third Dimension (3 March 2003)

Gettins, T C
		CFS: assumption of viral cause. (7 April 2004)

Girodian, Marcel
		See what one wants... (13 April 2005)
		See what one wants... (17 April 2005)

Green, Stephen T.
		HIV - which is the simplest and most obvious truth (25 May 2003)

Gregg, Aiden P.
		A modest proposal (29 May 2003)

Grove, Matthew L
		Condoms and Partner Choice are Important in Containing HIV (25 June 2003)
		HIV in South Africa (25 June 2003)
		HIV in South Africa (27 June 2003)

Hahn, Sang G.
		Who studies healthy HIV positives ? (3 June 2003)

Hawkins, Jennifer
		What is Christopher Noble?s method for proving the existence of a new retrovirus? (6 July 2004)
		Mice May Have Good Reason to Fear Male Pigs (29 September 2004)
		Mice May Have Good Reason to Fear Male Pigs (30 September 2004)
		Mice May Have Good Reason to Fear Male Pigs (30 September 2004)
		A Selection of Questions Recently not Answered by the 'Perth Group' (18 October 2004)
		Pneumocystis. Is it a Protozoan or a Fungus? Does it exist at all according to 'PG' isolation criteria? (19 October 2004)
		"HIV", Factor VIII and CD4s (20 October 2004)
		"HIV", Factor VIII and CD4s (20 October 2004)
		Suggestions That Respondents Provide a Consistent and Cogent Argument Should Not Be 'Disturbing' (21 October 2004)
		PCP and "HIV" (6 November 2004)
		Request for Peter Flegg and Outstanding 'Perth Group' Questions (24 November 2004)
		The Appeal of the Underdog and Unwillingess of the 'Perth Group' to Engage in Debate... (11 December 2004)

Helman
		Our basic requests to Brian Foley and Christopher Noble remain still unanswered (29 April 2004)

Herbert, Kate A
		The reality of AIDS in South Africa (2 March 2003)

Horwitz, Moses
		In fact, INCREDIBLE as it may sound, he acknowledged nothing of relevance to your enduringly specious arguments... (24 October 2003)
		Bess Continues to Have no Problem Telling Microvesicles from HIV. Why Have You Gone So Far Without Looking at the Rest of His Work? (24 October 2003)
		Out of all the Responses Four Arguments Have Emerged. Three of These Things are not Like the Other... (25 March 2004)
		Questions That Should Remain Unanswered by Peter Flegg (1 May 2004)
		What is Christopher Noble?s method for proving the existence of a new retrovirus? (6 July 2004)
		Mice May Have Good Reason to Fear Male Pigs (29 September 2004)
		Mice May Have Good Reason to Fear Male Pigs (30 September 2004)
		Mice May Have Good Reason to Fear Male Pigs (30 September 2004)
		A Selection of Questions Recently not Answered by the 'Perth Group' (18 October 2004)
		Pneumocystis. Is it a Protozoan or a Fungus? Does it exist at all according to 'PG' isolation criteria? (19 October 2004)
		"HIV", Factor VIII and CD4s (20 October 2004)
		"HIV", Factor VIII and CD4s (20 October 2004)
		Suggestions That Respondents Provide a Consistent and Cogent Argument Should Not Be 'Disturbing' (21 October 2004)
		PCP and "HIV" (6 November 2004)
		Request for Peter Flegg and Outstanding 'Perth Group' Questions (24 November 2004)
		The Appeal of the Underdog and Unwillingess of the 'Perth Group' to Engage in Debate... (11 December 2004)

Kamdar, Nassim C
		Mbeki's AIDS Panel still active (8 April 2005)

Kirkham, John
		Comparing HPV and HIV (30 July 2003)
		HIV Tunnel Vision (6 December 2003)

Konotey-Ahulu, Felix ID
		Wake up call and need for paradigm shift (3 April 2003)

Köhnlein, Claus
		The invisible epidemic and the AZT intoxication (2 March 2003)

Lewis, Jack P
		Political Mobilisation against HIV in South Africa (1 March 2003)

Madigan, James I
		Aids paradigm timeline (25 October 2004)
		An appeal to the moderators (26 October 2004)
		timeline and Ho (28 October 2004)
		RE: Nick Bennett: Ho and Pantaleo (1 November 2004)

Maguire, Stuart A
		The causes of AIDS and other diseases (14 July 2004)

Maniotis, Andrew
		More responses to Christopher Noble (24 February 2004)
		What is the Perth group's stand? (4 March 2004)
		Perth Group reasoning (26 March 2004)

Marshall, Trevor G
		Thoughts on Lymphopenia in AIDS and Sarcoidosis (16 July 2003)
		Gentlemen, It is Time For Even More Discussion on Genomics (15 October 2003)
		Professor Peron and an MS virus? (11 November 2003)
		Don't Confuse CFS with AIDS (7 April 2004)
		So, I see the picture, but what is it showing? (22 June 2004)

Mcgregor, Rod
		Oxidation - the primary cause for AIDS and "HIV" (25 January 2005)

Mhlongo, Sam
		HIV in South Africa (13 March 2003)
		POVERTY, SQUALOR & AIDS INDISTINGUISHABLE IN SOUTH AFRICA: MBEKI MISUNDERSTOOD AND MISREPRESENTED (14 March 2003)
		Low rates of heterosexual transmission and the HIV theory of AIDS (24 March 2003)
		More responses to Christopher Noble (24 February 2004)
		Perth Group response to Peter Flegg (26 February 2004)
		Perth Group response to Christopher Noble (26 February 2004)
		What is the Perth group's stand? (4 March 2004)
		More responses to Christopher Noble (9 March 2004)
		Basic requests which remain unanswered by Brian Foley and Christopher Noble (23 March 2004)
		Horizontal Transmission ? (23 March 2004)
		Perth Group reasoning (26 March 2004)
		Further response to James Parker (1 April 2004)
		What part of "infectious molecular clone" do you fail to understand? (4 April 2004)
		A second response to Christopher Noble's "What part of "infectious molecular clone" do you fail to understand?" (8 April 2004)
		A reasonable request to the ?HIV?/AIDS experts (20 April 2004)
		The reasonable request to the ?HIV?/AIDS experts still remains (23 April 2004)
		What ?infectious molecular clone of HIV? means? (28 April 2004)
		Two questions to Brian Foley (28 April 2004)
		Questions to Peter Flegg which remain still unanswered (30 April 2004)
		Two questions to Brian Foley (4 May 2004)
		Further response to James Parker FeLV Horizontal Transmission (6 May 2004)
		Two questions to Brian Foley (6 May 2004)
		Re-phrasing our two questions to Brian Foley (11 May 2004)
		A QUESTION AND A REQUEST TO BRIAN FOLEY (12 May 2004)
		A paraphrased request and a question to Brian Foley (14 May 2004)
		Eight simple questions and a repeated request to Brian Foley (24 May 2004)
		Twelve simple questions to Brian Foley (31 May 2004)
		One simple question for the Perth Group. (4 June 2004)
		New and repeated questions and requests to Brian Foley (8 June 2004)
		Did Montagnier discover HIV in 1983? (24 June 2004)
		More on the photo (25 June 2004)
		An oft repeated question to Brian Foley and Christopher Noble (28 June 2004)
		Retrovirologists, retroviruses and purification (1 July 2004)
		Without the ?HIV? genome (poly (A)-RNA banding at 1.16 g/ml) there can be no probes or molecular clones (1 July 2004)
		What is Christopher Noble?s method for proving the existence of a new retrovirus? (6 July 2004)
		One AIDS patient will suffice (6 July 2004)
		We repeat our request: What is Christopher Noble?s method of proving the existence of a new retrovirus? (9 July 2004)
		Where is the virus? (9 July 2004)
		Where is the virus? (14 July 2004)
		Again we ask Christopher Noble to tell us his method of proving the existence of a new retrovirus (14 July 2004)
		The HUT 78 cell line (15 July 2004)
		Where are the proper controls in "HIV" research? (19 July 2004)
		The non-existent knobs on "HIV" particles (19 July 2004)
		MONTAGNIER'S REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE ACTIVITY (23 July 2004)
		WE REPEAT, WHERE IS THE VIRUS? (23 July 2004)
		NICHOLAS BENNETT'S INTERPRETATION OF RICHIERI ET AL (23 July 2004)
		THE CELL LINES HUT102 AND HUT78 (5 August 2004)
		Is oxidation necessary for activation? (17 August 2004)
		Still no proper controls in HIV research (17 August 2004)
		Is oxidation of "HIV" the critical factor? (17 August 2004)
		Is "HIV" sufficient or necessary for T4 cell decrease (AID)? (17 August 2004)
		"HIV" and KS (17 August 2004)
		"HIV", HHV-8 AND KS (20 August 2004)
		Where is the evidence for the existence of the "HIV" genome (20 August 2004)
		Where is the evidence that "HIV" is causally related to KS? (20 August 2004)
		HUT-78 AND HTLV (31 August 2004)
		CELL DEATH AND OXIDATION (31 August 2004)
		A REQUEST TO NICHOLAS BENNETT, CHRISTOPHER NOBLE (31 August 2004)
		THREE REQUESTS TO PETER FLEGG (31 August 2004)
		IS OUR ANALYSIS OF THE ZAGURY PAPER (31 August 2004)
		WATER AND SEMEN: THE SAME CARCINOGENIC PROPERTIES? (2 September 2004)
		"OKT3, OKT4 and all that" (2 September 2004)
		Nicholas Bennett and the "HIV-1 infectious molecular clone" (6 September 2004)
		More on the "HIV" Genome (6 September 2004)
		SH levels alone are predictors of AIDS and mortality (7 September 2004)
		"HIV" "is not sufficient nor necessary" for KS (7 September 2004)
		Cell death, radiation and oxidation (7 September 2004)
		Nicholas Bennett and Montagnier's RT Activity (8 September 2004)
		Requests to Christopher Noble and Nicholas Bennett (8 September 2004)
		CAUSES OF LOW CD4 COUNTS IN AIDS (14 September 2004)
		SEMEN, NITRITES AND KS (17 September 2004)
		MORE ON RADIATION AND OXIDATION (17 September 2004)
		REPEAT, SH LEVELS ALONE ARE PREDICTORS OF AIDS AND MORTALITY (20 September 2004)
		FIVE QUESTIONS TO NICHOLAS BENNETT (21 September 2004)
		More on Nicholas Bennett and Montagnier's RT activity (28 September 2004)
		More on Nicholas Bennett's "HIV" infectious molecular clone (28 September 2004)
		"MECHANISM BY WHICH HIV CAUSES AIDS" (29 September 2004)
		More on CD4s (30 September 2004)
		"HIV" ? "a necessary or sufficient cause" for AIDS? (30 September 2004)
		Diagnosing ?HIV? infection in neonates (30 September 2004)
		PACTG 076 and HIVNET 012 (30 September 2004)
		Repeat, the origin of the CK and RT activity (11 October 2004)
		Questions to Nicholas Bennett and Peter Flegg (11 October 2004)
		Give us the "HIV" "structure", please. (11 October 2004)
		TB, "HIV" antibody tests and AIDS (14 October 2004)
		The "HIV" antibody tests are not diagnostic (14 October 2004)
		"HIV" and PCP (14 October 2004)
		"HIV", Factor VIII and CD4s (14 October 2004)
		"HIV" and AIDS (16 October 2004)
		HHV-8 and KS (18 October 2004)
		Repeat, SHs play a critical role in cell survival following irradiation (18 October 2004)
		Repeat, the "HIV" antibody tests are not diagnostic (20 October 2004)
		Repeat, give us the "HIV" "structure", please (25 October 2004)
		"HIV" necessary for AIDS? (25 October 2004)
		Once again, the origin of the CK and RT cannot be determined by their "RELATIVE amounts" (25 October 2004)
		Yet again, give us the "HIV" structure, please (25 October 2004)
		Yet again on "HIV" and AIDS (25 October 2004)
		HTLV a lentivirus? (25 October 2004)
		PCP and "HIV" (5 November 2004)
		What is the evidence that "HIV" causes PCP? (29 November 2004)
		GIVE US THE EVIDENCE THAT "HIV" DECREASES THE CD4 COUNT (7 December 2004)
		No scientific evidence ? no scientific debate (16 December 2004)
		A question to Brian Foley (13 January 2005)
		Oxidation - the primary cause for AIDS and "HIV" (21 January 2005)
		Clinical trials of antioxidants